首页> 外文OA文献 >Quantifying European Legislative Research : using CELEX and PreLex in EU legislative studies
【2h】

Quantifying European Legislative Research : using CELEX and PreLex in EU legislative studies

机译:量化欧洲立法研究:在欧盟立法研究中使用CELEX和PreLex

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research on European legislative decision-making has entered a stage of quantitative analysis. The quantitative approach promises to advance the current dialogue by allowing for the evaluation of competing approaches across multiple policy domains and over time. At the same time, the quantitative study of EU decision-making introduces a number of drawbacks: it is difficult to identify one definitive source for legislative information, and case-level data are not directly accessible in a machine-readable format. In order to identify the most crucial pitfalls and provide a reliable data source, we evaluate the most frequently cited, publicly available EU legislative database, CELEX, and compare it with a less publicized legislative database referred to as PreLex. We find that CELEX documents legislative events, whereas PreLex records inter-institutional activities in the legislative process. Unsurprisingly, each of these databases has particular advantages, and we discuss which of the two might be better suited for the analysis of specific research questions.
机译:欧洲立法决策研究已进入定量分析阶段。定量方法有望通过评估跨多个政策领域以及随着时间推移的竞争方法来推进当前的对话。同时,对欧盟决策的定量研究也带来了许多弊端:很难为立法信息确定一个明确的来源,并且不能以机器可读的格式直接访问案例级别的数据。为了识别最关键的陷阱并提供可靠的数据源,我们评估了引用频率最高,可公开获得的欧盟立法数据库CELEX,并将其与较少公开的立法数据库PreLex进行了比较。我们发现CELEX记录了立法事件,而PreLex记录了立法过程中的机构间活动。毫不奇怪,这些数据库中的每一个都有其特殊的优势,我们讨论了这两个数据库中的哪个可能更适合特定研究问题的分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号